The Secret to Winning at Court – Court Remedy

The Secret to Winning at Court – Court Remedy

This page lists many methods. Please scroll to see all. This is NOT legal advice. This project is part of my law studies to become educated in law. These are my notes. Thou should find competent counsel (not attorney) if thou needs advice. 

Note some things first:

  • Thou is not a ‘person/persona‘. The person/persona is a corporate entity or trust. Be man or woman.
  • Thou also is not a ‘resident‘. Thou lives in thy body. Thou lives on the land, not in it. Thou is not ‘in’ the courthouse. Thou is possibly at the courthouse. ‘Resident’ and ‘residence’ can actually be political, not geographic, terms. Look up the legal meaning of resident. There is a building in Washington, DC, called the former residence of the Spanish Ambassador.
  • Thou is not a defendant, a mister, a suspect, or a person. These are actors or titles in their play/game on their court. Thou is man or woman!!!! See Anti-terrorist videos below to learn how to thwart the mister game. 
  • Appearance means to grant jurisdiction!!! It does not simply mean to show up. Either avoid court altogether by replying to summons or just sending it back (see below).
    • Definition: ‘If One does ANYTHING ‘Beneficial’ or ‘Detrimental’, One ‘HAS MADE APPEARANCE’ as a Party’ (per CJS). If it ain’t ‘Neutral’, you HAVE “MADE APPEARANCE”. Taken from this site
    • Or if thou goes to court, make a ‘special’ appearance, not a ‘general’ appearance, as noted by the Antiterrorist below in one of his court videos. 
  • Note, giving bail may mean making an appearance (See Bouvier’s law). Stick it out in jail. Don’t sign anything. Don’t take anything, without first asking if thou can reserve all rights whilst accepting a blanket. 
  • Summons means ‘notify a party to appear in court’. Related to the definition of appearance above, thou does not want to make an appearance. From all that I’ve read, avoid court altogether. But thou is required to respond to summons and any notices, or return-to-sender. Thou can’t dishonour a summons by ignoring it.  
  • Courts can only rule on disputes or controversies. Many people quote the bible stating, “Agree with thine adversary, on the way to court…” Possibly meaning that if thou conditionally accepts an offer, such as a ticket, then there is no dispute. There is a counteroffer.

Don’t sign anything

Here’s an excerpt of the book Paper Arrows (recommended by Yusuf El).

Important case about arraignment. See text below image.

In this case, it was determined that the jailers cannot hold anyone more than 48 hours without a probable cause hearing or a bail hearing or an arraignment.

(One must “sign in” for the bail hearing or arraignment, so do not sign.)

Send back the summons!

Editor’s note: This tactic is to send back the summons (return-to-sender) to avoid making ‘an appearance‘ which is to accept and grant jurisdiction.


Neutral response:

Print & Cut along dotted line

These enclosed documents were inadvertently received, and opened by mistake. These enclosed document(s), which appear to be____________________________________________________, are not understandable, acknowledgeable or recognizable under the penalty of False Personation must be returned.

The enclosure herein contains the aforementioned and misdirected documents; as there is not enough knowledge or information disclosed to form a responsive answer, said documents are being returned forthwith.


Singular response

print & cut along dotted line


I inadvertently received the enclosed document(s) which appear to be

I do not know what this is all about. I do not understand or recognize these document(s).

I do not have enough knowledge or information to form a responsive answer.

So I am returning these document(s),

Immediately Place documents to be returned in a new envelope. Immediately Address new envelope with document sender’s address, also use this address as the return address. DO NOT use YOUR name or address on this envelope, Do not use any headings or signature on your response. The object is to return the presentment in the most neutral, non-committal manner possible Immediately. Do not rebut the issue or address anything in their documents. You simply return unwanted presentments. This is simply a misdirected posting being returned to the sender.

Declare in writing thou is a man or woman — Karl Lentz Method Explained:

Explaining the Karl Lentz approach. From Critical Mass meeting in UK.

“Many people are worried when they’re writing out anything that they want to put into court about using their name. Don’t be afraid of your name. It’s yours. Be proud of it. It’s not going to hurt you.

If you go in as a person, your name is going to be written all over you. It’s on your back. It’s like a monkey. It’s going to ride you and ride you hard.

But if you stand up and say, “I’m a man. My name is Freeman ______.”

That’s it. I’ve already claimed my status. I’m a man.  From then on in, no one can tell me that I’m a person. You’ve just done away with all of their myth.

So you want to be a man or a woman. So I’m a man in court. But how do I become a man in court. That’s your paperwork. You’re going to an administrative court. An administrative court can only hear your paperwork. You’ve no voice until you tell them who you are. And you tell them with your paperwork. A 2D court can’t hear a 3D voice. It can only hear 2D paperwork.

So the first thing you’ve got to do is enter some paperwork into that court to a court number (?) to say I’m a man. Once you’ve done that, you’ve claimed your status. You’ve said to them, I a man in this venue have a voice. Once you’ve got a voice you can speak.

This will terrify them. Of course it’s going to terrify them. Who wants to be talked to as a man in their court. They’re all persons.  The judge is a person. The clerk of the court is a person. The solicitor is a person. Everybody else there is a person.

And don’t try to be clever. Don’t try and say oh the paperwork they’ve sent me what they’re trying to do… Be a simple man. A simple man can only read what’s written in front of him. So if you’ve got a summons from Her Majesty’s Court and Revenue, I expect Her Majesty’s Court and Revenue to be in court because her majesty’s court and revenue, according to that piece of paper in front of me is the one who’s bringing the claim and I want to hear the claimant’s voice.

So you say the nine words.

I a man require the plaintiff appear in court.

Or “claimant appear in court” depends on what your summons says. And when you get to court, because you’ve put the paperwork in, =

To be continued….

From the YouTube comments:

  • Q. What kind of court proceedings would this work?
    A. One where there is no injured party or one where the plaintiff is a fiction of law.

Thou is not a defendant or a person or a mister. Those are legal fictions – titles – offices. Thou is man. See this video series. Thou might also want to ask:

  1. Are we are the record? [If it’s not on the record, then it can be reviewed on appeal.]
  2. Judge, do you have an oath of office? [Wait for reply. Then say,] For and on the record, this court takes judicial notice of the judge’s oath.
  3. More here in this three-part video series.

You are not a mister – Three videos by AT These videos are excellent. Know these words by heart! Practice.

I do not consent. How to win in court.

(Editor’s note: This tactic may only work if one first tells the judge in writing that one is a living man or woman. See Karl Lentz method explanation on this page. The court can’t hear living men/women until the living man/woman enters paperwork stating, ‘I am man’ or ‘I am woman’.)

Do not sign anything. Do not get a lawyer. The rest appears below.

Here’s the text:

Do not sign anything.

Do not get a lawyer.

You tell the judge this word for word and nothing else.

This is for the record. I am here in the body of flesh and blood.

(Now read these four sentences)

  1. I do not consent to these proceedings.
  2. Your offer is not accepted.
  3. I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.
  4. I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if [I’m] damaged

Your case will be dismissed.

The judge has no choice other than to dismissal of your case he/she can not bring up the bond. Then give this to every defendant. The courts will close down because the courts are a Private Business and not a justice machine as originally thought.


Thou might also want to get the case discharged and with prejudice. A dismissed case may be re-opened. A discharged case may not. Similarly, with prejudice means, though maybe in a different way, that the case can’t be re-tried. At least get the case dismissed with prejudice. The “with prejudice” part should do the trick. Also, thou might say to the judge that it is your wish. “I wish that the case be discharged with prejudice.” Thou may only wish for something. Never want of anything. Wants may be denied.

I am idiot.

This came to me as a true story although I cannot confirm how true it is but did come from someone who gives reliable information. Here it is without any changes.
True story:
A man went to court. He told the judge he was an idiot and didn’t understand their statutes. He asked, “Do you prosecute idiots in your court room?” “No,” said the judge. “Get out of here.” He left. The Judge then said, “If there are any other idiots in my courtroom, get out now.” They all stayed, got prosecuted, and fined . . . except the idiot who left the courtroom.
“Idiot” is another word that has changed its meaning over the centuries, although not as dramatically as “nice” once it was imported into English.
The Greek “idiotes” meant simply “private individual” (from “idios,” meaning “personal”), as opposed to a “public man,” a politician (government agent mine) or other well-known individual. (“Idios” also gave us “idiom,” one’s own way of speaking, and “idiosyncrasy,” one’s personal quirks and habits.)


I object to the whole thing’

(Editor’s note: This tactic may only work if one first tells the judge in writing that one is a living man or woman. See Karl Lentz method explanation on this page. The court can’t hear living men/women until the living man/woman enters paperwork stating, ‘I am man’ or ‘I am woman’.)

“I object to the whole thing.”

“It is my wish that it be that way.” (Your wish is the judge’s command.)


This entry was posted in Current Affairs, News, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.